I understand exactly. Arguing the merits would be a good idea, Frankie, but you only insult and double-team. Glad to see you're all feeling your oats. Had a good old rave up at your tea bagging party, I see?
Here, I love liberal hypocrites like you. You complain about insults and then turn around and insult. Either that or you are so ignorant that you really don't understand that tea-bagging is a liberal term and something liberals seem to like.
And I dislike neocons who can only insult. How about answering fairly posed questions? Or do you think that no one gets to have an opposing viewpoint? Just to answer your last point: Tea-bagging is a stolen neocon word that doesn't mean what you think it means. How clueless is that? While you're at it, why don't you confess that you guys stole the whole concept from the Ron Paul/ Libertarian party folks? Last question: Why can't we see a proper, areal photo of you tea bagging parties? Were they really as badly attended as that?
Here, You really need to keep up to date. I've posted on more than one occasion that I am a Libertarian. I just tend to vote Republican because otherwise it's currently a wasted vote. Ron Paul has no problem with the use of the Tea Parties. The neo-cons didn't invent the phrase tea-bagging nor did they steal it. The term is "Tea Parties". The fact that several of your ilk decided to change it doesn't mean that we have. I realize that you liberals like to "redefine" things (gay, marriage, sex, is) but that doesn't mean we are all going to go along with it. I know that bothers you. Get over it. You haven't posed any fairly asked questions because you simply do not know how. As a typical liberal you think that only your viewpoint is valid when it's quite clear that your education is as lacking as your intelligence. You limit what you read and view to those things which agree with you and never bother to look any further. If you want an aerial view of a Tea Party, google it. If you want to see tea bagging, ask a liberal.
